01965nas a2200229 4500008004100000245011900041210006900160260001500229300000800244490000700252520127500259653001201534653000701546653003201553653000901585653002101594653002601615653001301641100001601654700002101670856004401691 2022 eng d00aBrothers in Arms? How neoliberalism connects North and South Higher Education: Finland and Portugal in perspective0 aBrothers in Arms How neoliberalism connects North and South High c13/05/2022 a2130 v113 a

This paper puts in perspective the reforms of the Portuguese and Finnish higher education (HE) sectors in the light of the role intergovernmental organisations have—especially the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)—in influencing neoliberal public policies in these countries. On the year that the OECD celebrates its 62nd anniversary, (the OECD was founded with this name on 14 December 1960 by 20 countries, following the establishment of the former European Economic Co-operation (OEEC) in April 1948) and by comparing two different countries, this article analyses the extent to which the OECD has been and is an “imperial agent” in Portuguese and Finnish HE policies. By cross-comparing the OECD reports of both HE systems, the empirical data shows how the OECD proposes neoliberal reforms based on three main components of neoliberalism: market, management and performativity in different countries. Taking these proposals into account, Portugal and Finland undertook similar HE legislative reforms despite their geographical, historical, cultural and economic differences. The data reveal a convergence in HE policies in these countries, anticipating the reinforcement of neoliberal policies at the national level. 

10aFinland10aHE10aNew Public Management (NPM)10aOECD10apolicy diffusion10apolicy implementation10aPortugal1 aDiogo, Sara1 aCarvalho, Teresa uhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/5/21304805nas a2200277 4500008004100000022002200041245014100063210006900204250004400273260003000317300001400347520386800361653001104229653001204240653001804252653001504270653003404285653003204319653001504351653002604366653001304392100001604405700001904421700002104440856006604461 2019 eng d a978-3-030-15757-900aAn International Comparative Perspective on Higher Education Institutions’ Governance and Management – Portugal, Finland, and Brazil0 aInternational Comparative Perspective on Higher Education Instit aA. Moreira, P. Jen-Jacques, N. Bagnall  bPalgrave Macmillan, Cham. a109–1333 a

Reforms in higher education (HE) in the last decades have been influenced by global and international trends associated with two parallel processes: questioning of the nation-state and the gradual decomposition of the welfare state (Carvalho and Santiago in Professionalism, Managerialism and Reform in Higher Education and the Health Services: The European Welfare State and the Rise of the Knowledge Society. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015; Kwiek in Higher Education in Europe 26:27–38, 2001). These processes intersect with the influence of neo-liberal ideas, strongly diffused by international organizations (Amaral and Neave in International Organizations and Higher Education Policy: Thinking Globally, Acting Locally. Routledge, London, pp. 82–98, 2009; Ball in Policy Futures in Education 14:1046–1059, 2016). According to Stephan Ball (Policy Futures in Education 14:1046–1059, 2016), neo-liberal influences in HE can be summarized by three interrelated and interdependent technologies: market, management, and performance. These technologies were translated in the emergence of new management and governance models within higher education institutions (HEIs) in such a way that institutional governance became an international issue (Reed and Meek in Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. xv–xxxi, 2002). It has been acknowledged that changes in governance and management structures in HE all over the world include transformations in the Humboldtian principles of organization along with changes in the collegial model of decision-making and a redefinition of power relations, where external stakeholders and new professionals assume a relevant role within academia (Capano in Public Administration 89:1622–1642, 2011; Reed and Meek in Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. xv–xxxi, 2002; Welch in Higher Education in Southeast Asia: Blurring Borders, Changing Balance. Taylor & Francis, 2011), with implications on academics’ work (Blackmore et al. in Re-positioning University Governance and Academic Work. Sense Publishers, 2010; Carvalho and Santiago in Higher Education Policy 23:397–411, 2010; Marginson in Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 22:23–35, 2000). Nevertheless, few comparative international perspectives have been developed, especially when considering the need to include countries with distinct historical processes of nation-state creation, different welfare state models and diverse levels of economic development, and social and cultural characteristics. There is, indeed, a study gap on New Public Management (NPM) constructs and their application “with little understanding of several important cultural dimensions” (Stromquist in Compare 30:261–264, 2000). This chapter compares the perceived changes in HEI management and its impact on academics in three countries: Brazil, Finland, and Portugal. Data analysis relies on a qualitative approach, empirically based on 70 interviews conducted in the 3 countries to top and middle academic managers, following the same interviewing guidelines. Despite significant differences in systems’ organization and funding, cultures’ governance and management, and professionals’ and students’ profiles, there are more similar views on changes in governance and management and its impact on academics than expected. In these countries, academics expressed similar views on the increased influence of a management culture within their institutions and a loss of professional autonomy.

10aBrazil10aFinland10aGlobalization10aGovernance10aHigher Education Institutions10aInternational organizations10aManagement10anew public management10aPortugal1 aDiogo, Sara1 aBarbosa, Milka1 aCarvalho, Teresa uhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-15758-6_501858nas a2200217 4500008004100000245012900041210006900170260001600239300001000255490000700265520113200272653002101404653002601425653001201451653002901463653002701492653001301519100002101532700001601553856007101569 2017 eng d00aExploring the relationship between institutional and professional autonomy: a comparative study between Portugal and Finland0 aExploring the relationship between institutional and professiona c12 Nov 2017 a18-330 v403 a

By comparing two distinct settings–Portugal and Finland–and based on previous studies revealing similar trends in both countries, this article analyses the relationship between institutional and academic autonomy in the higher education sector. Based on crosschecking of the literature review and 47 interviews with key actors in both the Portuguese and Finnish higher education systems, the authors analyse the extent to which the political attempts to increase institutional autonomy are perceived by academics in these countries as leading to an increase in their professional autonomy. Data reveals that there is a lack of complete correspondence between the way different institutional dimensions have been changing at the organisational level and the way academics perceive the effects at the professional level. While there is a correspondence in the perceptions over organisational and interventional autonomy, no correspondence is found concerning policy autonomy in both countries. Furthermore, there are no homogeneous perceptions within academics group in each country concerning professional autonomy.

10aacademic freedom10acomparative education10aFinland10ahigher education systems10ainstitutional autonomy10aPortugal1 aCarvalho, Teresa1 aDiogo, Sara uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1395916