@conference {4094,
	title = {Where is Gender? A Missing Variable in Scientific Research},
	booktitle = {15th International Technology, Education and Development Conference},
	year = {2021},
	month = {8-9 March, 2021},
	publisher = {IATED Academy},
	organization = {IATED Academy},
	address = {Online Conference},
	abstract = {<p>Gender Equality in science and research has become increasingly relevant within the European Union (EU) and within the European Research Area (ERA). In recent years, significant efforts have been made to achieve the three objectives set by the ERA on gender equality: increasing gender balance in research teams, increasing gender balance in decision-making, and strengthening the gender dimension in research. The work that has been performed at EU level and across ERA countries has brought some improvements, but the objective of strengthening the gender dimension in research has received little attention in several countries and, overall, the number of publications that incorporate the gender dimension remains low (EC 2019). In some countries, such as Portugal, gender in/equality continues to be seen (and handled) as an issue of (under)representation of women in research; the gender dimension in research seems thus to be sidelined. This work, carried out as part of an international H2020 funded research project (CHANGE {\textendash} CHalleNging Gender (In)Equality in science and research), seeks to bring this issue to the center of the debate. Through a comparative perspective, this study aims to explore, characterise and analyse, how a Portuguese university (University of Aveiro {\textendash} UA) has been involving the gender perspective in their research outputs in the last decades. In order to achieve the purpose of the research, the annual percentage of SCOPUS publications incorporating a gender perspective in the UA (i.e. publications which have gender, women or sex in the title, abstract or keywords) is determined and its evolution along the last decades analysed. The analysis reveals that in each year analysed, the percentage of UA SCOPUS publications with a gender focus is always below 3.5\%. The first UA publication that meets the requirements of our SCOPUS database search appeared in the year 2000 and {\textendash} as with most Portuguese public HEIs analysed in the framework of this study {\textendash} progress in recent years has been slow and oscillate between advancements and setbacks. Between 2000 and 2019 the percentage of UA SCOPUS publications incorporating the gender dimension increased only 1.91 percentage points. Taking that Gender Equality is one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, universities and academics need to reflect on the need to increase the integration of the gender perspective in research.</p>
},
	keywords = {european research area, gender dimension, Higher Education Institutions, Portugal, research},
	isbn = {978-84-09-27666-0},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2021.1948 },
	url = {https://library.iated.org/view/JORDAO2021WHE},
	author = {Carina Jord{\~a}o and Sara Diogo and Teresa Carvalho}
}
@article {3940,
	title = {{\textquoteleft}Welcome to Wonderland{\textquoteright}. Integration rituals and ceremonies for higher education first-year students, and lessons for institutions},
	journal = {European Journal of Higher Education},
	year = {2021},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.2000881 },
	author = {Maria Jos{\'e} S{\'a}}
}
@article {3846,
	title = {What is an internship report? Contributions to the construction of its meaning },
	journal = {Journal of Education and e-Learning Research},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {1-6},
	issn = {2518-0169},
	doi = {10.20448/journal.509.2020.71.1.6},
	url = {https://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/1219/1218},
	author = {Ana Isabel Santos and Carlos Miguel Ferreira and Sandro Serpa and Maria Jos{\'e} S{\'a}}
}
@article {4069,
	title = {Women Rectors and Leadership Narratives: The Same Male Norm?},
	journal = {Education Sciences},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2018},
	month = {23 May 2018},
	chapter = {75},
	abstract = {<p>This paper examines how two Portuguese women rectors constructed narratives on their path to leadership positions and their performance of leadership roles. The study is based on a qualitative empirical analysis based on life story interviews with two women rectors in Portugal. The results from this research suggest that women rectors tend to develop narratives about their professional route to the top as based on merit and hard work, and tend to classify their leadership experience as gender-neutral and grounded on the establishment of good relationships with their peers along their professional path. These narratives may contribute to reinforcing the male norm that leads other women to blame themselves for not being able to progress in their career, hindering the creation of an organisational environment that is open to the development of institutional policies to improve equal opportunities. Portugal is a very interesting case study, considering that despite the long history of its higher education system and the high participation of women in higher education, there were only two women rectors in the country until 2014.</p>
},
	keywords = {female leadership, gender and leadership, Portugal, women rectors},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020075},
	url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/8/2/75},
	author = {Teresa Carvalho and Sara Diogo}
}
@conference {3474,
	title = {What is best for future accountants{\textquoteright} professional success: An internship or a business project?},
	booktitle = {EDULEARN18 Proceedings},
	year = {2018},
	month = {2-4 July, 2018},
	publisher = {IATED},
	organization = {IATED},
	isbn = {978-84-09-02709-5},
	doi = {10.21125/edulearn.2018.1942},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.1942},
	author = {A. Lucas and D. Dias}
}
@proceedings {3454,
	title = {What makes the difference in students{\textquoteright} soft skills development: An analysis of laureate professional assessment (LPA) results},
	year = {2018},
	author = {Diana Soares and D. Dias}
}
@proceedings {3408,
	title = {What actually matters in a Philosophy curriculum?},
	year = {2018},
	publisher = {Edulearn 2018},
	address = {Palma de mallorca, Spain},
	doi = {DOI: 10.21125/edulearn.2018.1635},
	url = {https://library.iated.org/view/TAVARES2018WHA},
	author = {Orlanda Tavares and Diana Soares and D. Dias}
}
@article {Dias_2017,
	title = {Working with cancer: Motivation and job satisfaction},
	journal = {International Journal of Organizational Analysis},
	volume = {25},
	number = {4},
	year = {2017},
	month = {sep},
	pages = {662{\textendash}686},
	publisher = {Emerald},
	doi = {10.1108/ijoa-12-2016-1096},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1108\%2Fijoa-12-2016-1096},
	author = {D. Dias and {\^A}. Leite and A. Ramires and P. Bicho}
}
@inbook {Maria_de_Lourdes_Machado-Taylor32775727,
	title = {What is the new academic profession?},
	booktitle = {Challenges and options: The academic profession in Europe},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {253-267},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	address = {Dordrecht},
	isbn = {978-3-319-45843-4},
	author = {U. Teichler and M. L. Machado-Taylor and V. Meira Soares},
	editor = {M. L. Machado-Taylor and V. Meira Soares and U. Teichler}
}
@article {Rosa2016,
	title = {Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics},
	journal = {Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education},
	volume = {41},
	number = {6},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {950-965},
	author = {S{\'o}nia Cardoso and Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa and B. Stensaker}
}
@article {1588,
	title = {Who is responsible for employability? Student perceptions and practices},
	journal = {Tertiary Education and Management},
	volume = {22},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {65-81},
	author = {Cristina Sin and Orlanda Tavares and Alberto Amaral}
}
@inbook {Teixeira201613,
	title = {What role for private higher education in Europe? Reflecting about current patterns and future prospects},
	booktitle = {A Global Perspective on Private Higher Education},
	year = {2016},
	note = {cited By 0},
	pages = {13-28},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	organization = {Elsevier},
	address = {Amsterdam},
	doi = {10.1016/B978-0-08-100872-0.00002-1},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84969654926\&doi=10.1016\%2fB978-0-08-100872-0.00002-1\&partnerID=40\&md5=4d52df417163d14c94d94c7e9dea970d},
	author = {P. Teixeira and R. Biscaia and V. Rocha and M.F. Cardoso},
	editor = {M. Shah and C. S. Nair}
}
@article { cardoso2015,
	title = {Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics},
	journal = {Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education},
	year = {2015},
	author = {S{\'o}nia Cardoso and Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa and B. Stensaker}
}
@booklet {Maria_de_Lourdes_Machado-Taylor33294571,
	title = {Working paper 9 {\textendash} Question{\'a}rio: Resultados globais},
	year = {2015},
	author = {R. Gomes and J. T. Lopes and H. Vaz and L. Cerdeira and R. Ganga and M. L. Machado-Taylor and D Magalhaes and B. G. Cabrito and Tom{\'a}s Patroc{\'\i}nio and S{\'\i}lvia Silva and R. Brites and P. Peixoto}
}
@booklet {Maria_de_Lourdes_Machado-Taylor33294572,
	title = {Working paper 10 - General conclusions},
	year = {2015},
	author = {R. Gomes and J. T. Lopes and H. Vaz and L. Cerdeira and R. Ganga and M. L. Machado-Taylor and D Magalhaes and B. G. Cabrito and Tom{\'a}s Patroc{\'\i}nio and S{\'\i}lvia Silva and R. Brites and P. Peixoto}
}
@booklet {Maria_de_Lourdes_Machado-Taylor33294453,
	title = {Working paper 6 - Questionnaire: General conclusions},
	year = {2015},
	author = {R. Gomes and J. T. Lopes and H. Vaz and L. Cerdeira and R. Ganga and M. L. Machado-Taylor and D Magalhaes and B. G. Cabrito and Tom{\'a}s Patroc{\'\i}nio and S{\'\i}lvia Silva and R. Brites and P. Peixoto}
}
@booklet {Maria_de_Lourdes_Machado-Taylor33294542,
	title = {Working paper 7 - Question{\'a}rio: Respostas abertas},
	year = {2015},
	author = {R. Gomes and J. T. Lopes and H. Vaz and L. Cerdeira and R. Ganga and M. L. Machado-Taylor and D Magalhaes and B. G. Cabrito and Tom{\'a}s Patroc{\'\i}nio and S{\'\i}lvia Silva and R. Brites and P. Peixoto}
}
@booklet {Maria_de_Lourdes_Machado-Taylor33294555,
	title = {Working paper 8 - Sociological portraits: General results},
	year = {2015},
	author = {R. Gomes and J. T. Lopes and H. Vaz and L. Cerdeira and R. Ganga and M. L. Machado-Taylor and D Magalhaes and B. G. Cabrito and Tom{\'a}s Patroc{\'\i}nio and S{\'\i}lvia Silva and R. Brites and P. Peixoto}
}
@inbook {3177,
	title = {Where are quality frontiers moving to?},
	booktitle = {Quality assurance in higher education. Contemporary debates},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {13{\textendash}31},
	publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan},
	organization = {Palgrave Macmillan},
	address = {London},
	author = {Alberto Amaral},
	editor = {Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa and Alberto Amaral}
}
@article {Diana_Dias31321723,
	title = {Waves of (dis)satisfaction: Effects of the numerus clausus system in Portugal},
	journal = {European Journal of Education},
	volume = {49},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {144{\textendash}158},
	doi = {10.1111/ejed.12042},
	url = {http://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12042},
	author = {M. Fonseca and D. Dias and C. S{\'a} and Alberto Amaral}
}
@inbook {Machado_Taylor_2014,
	title = {Women in academic leadership},
	booktitle = {Gender transformation in the academy},
	year = {2014},
	month = {oct},
	pages = {375{\textendash}393},
	publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
	organization = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
	doi = {10.1108/s1529-212620140000019017},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1108\%2Fs1529-212620140000019017},
	author = {M. L. Machado-Taylor and K. White}
}
@article {Veiga2013,
	title = {What about education in higher education?},
	journal = {Higher Education: Recent Trends, Emerging Issues and Future Outlook},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {57-72},
	author = {A. Magalh{\~a}es and L.G. Veiga}
}
@article {Veiga_2013,
	title = {Why is it difficult to grasp the impacts of the Portuguese quality assurance system?},
	journal = {European Journal of Education},
	volume = {48},
	number = {3},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {454{\textendash}470},
	publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
	doi = {10.1111/ejed.12040},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1111\%2Fejed.12040},
	author = {L.G. Veiga and Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa and D. Dias and Alberto Amaral}
}
@article {Machado2011,
	title = {What factors of satisfaction and motivation are affecting the development of the academic career in portuguese higher education institutions? | Que fatores de satisfa{\c c}{\~a}o e motiva{\c c}{\~a}o afetam o desenvolvimento da carreira acad{\'e}mica em IES portuguesas?},
	journal = {Revista de Administracao Publica},
	volume = {45},
	number = {1},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {33-44},
	issn = {0034-7612 },
	doi = {10.1590/S0034-76122011000100003  },
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122011000100003  },
	author = {M. L. Machado-Taylor and Virg{\'\i}lio Meira Soares and J. Brites Ferreira and O. Gouveia}
}
@article {Teixeira2007208,
	title = {Waiting for the tide to change? Strategies for survival of Portuguese private HEIs},
	journal = {Higher Education Quarterly},
	volume = {61},
	number = {2},
	year = {2007},
	note = {cited By 13},
	pages = {208-222},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00347.x},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84969666293\&doi=10.1111\%2fj.1468-2273.2007.00347.x\&partnerID=40\&md5=14929fd5af3669267e211234644f45b1},
	author = {P. Teixeira and Alberto Amaral}
}
@proceedings {Santiago2001,
	title = {WebMaster - An internet information support system for academic services using ASP technology: Modelling and implementation},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {967-973},
	author = {Carlos Miguel Ferreira and L. Teixeira and Rui Santiago}
}
